<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoot First, Look for Cops Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/</link>
	<description>We've been humiliating dumb crooks since 1999. New stories are added several times each week!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brianna</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-39581</link>
		<dc:creator>Brianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-39581</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to the Associated Press, two men in Tuscaloosa, Ala. was arrested by police after he tried to shoot at a man in a parked car with a shotgun while a police officer sat right behind him at a red light.&quot;


It should be &quot;two men in Tuscaloosa, Ala. -WERE- arrested...&quot; 

Thanks.

Bri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to the Associated Press, two men in Tuscaloosa, Ala. was arrested by police after he tried to shoot at a man in a parked car with a shotgun while a police officer sat right behind him at a red light.&#8221;</p>
<p>It should be &#8220;two men in Tuscaloosa, Ala. -WERE- arrested&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Bri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-38634</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-38634</guid>
		<description>this gave me a orgasm lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this gave me a orgasm lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-37743</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-37743</guid>
		<description>guns shouldnt exist anyway remove them a wmds and fire arms of any kind and crime rate would plumet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guns shouldnt exist anyway remove them a wmds and fire arms of any kind and crime rate would plumet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jer</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-31947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-31947</guid>
		<description>Some of these arguments are completely idiotic. First of all, the crime rate in England, since the gun ban, is up a LOT. I read one statistic that put it at 200%. The reason is that, criminals (with or without guns) know that the victims are unarmed. Another example, Washington DC&#039;s crime rate sky rocketed after the ban was put in place. Funny though, that when a Florida Police department (don&#039;t remember which one right now) publicly announced that it was training/licensing women to carry/use a pistol, the rape rate in that city dropped to one of the lowest in the country and the overall crime rate decreased significantly. 

If someone pointed a gun at me, and I knew that ammo was &quot;hard to get&quot;, I wouldn&#039;t s**t my pants. I would think &quot;what a moron&quot;.  

So private citizens owning/carrying firearms doesn&#039;t deter invasions? What about Switzerland? They don&#039;t even have a real standing army, yet it has been something like 800 years since they were last invaded. Every adult male and many females are issued military assault rifles and pistols by the government and are expected to use them. There is a story from they early 1900s (not sure if it really happened; however, it is still cool) that says, A German General was visiting Switzerland when he asked the Swiss Leader, &quot;How many men to you command?&quot; The Swiss replied, &quot;I can have 1 million men ready in less then 24 hours.&quot; The German the asked, &quot;What would you and your men do if I marched 5 million troops in to your country tomorrow?&quot; The Swiss smiled and said, &quot;We would all take 5 shots, then we would go home!&quot;   They have it right in Switzerland, they do shooting competitions that are sponsered by there Government. All of this to ensure they have the best collection of marksmen in the world so that they, not the &quot;military&quot; can defend the country. There are even jouurnalists that have noted 13 year old girls riding bikes from school to the gun range with fully automatic assault rifles strapped to thier backs. Oh, and I forgot to mention, they have very low violent and gun crime rates.

If our Government or military happen to try to take over the country, that is &quot;suppress our rights as citizens&quot;, whos responsibility is it defend those rights? The citizens of this great country!!! The militia was not designed to defend us from other countries but our own, if a &quot;Hitler&quot; came along. Tell me this, how exactly do you expect to defend yourself from the military without guns? Yes I know the military has the Navy and it&#039;s many ASSets, the Air Force and it&#039;s leathal arsenal, the Army and Marines as bullet catchers and slingers (just kidding guys), but we as citizens of a FREE country have the DUTY to defend ourselves and our rights. 

Anybody who thinks that &quot;Gun Control&quot; will control anything, is simply ignorant. Many studies have been conducted using prison inmates as the subjects. They asked things like, &quot;If you thought a person might be armed with a firearm, would you be likely to commit a crime against them?&quot; The responses were so overwhelming that many Gun control advocates have had to rethink thier arguments. Almost all criminals interviewed said that they were less likely to commit ANY crime in an area that had little or no gun control; however, if gun control was intact, they wouldn&#039;t hessitate. 

The next time you decide to argue/debate a subject as heated as this one, PLEASE do some research and show up with a semi-intelligent opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these arguments are completely idiotic. First of all, the crime rate in England, since the gun ban, is up a LOT. I read one statistic that put it at 200%. The reason is that, criminals (with or without guns) know that the victims are unarmed. Another example, Washington DC&#8217;s crime rate sky rocketed after the ban was put in place. Funny though, that when a Florida Police department (don&#8217;t remember which one right now) publicly announced that it was training/licensing women to carry/use a pistol, the rape rate in that city dropped to one of the lowest in the country and the overall crime rate decreased significantly. </p>
<p>If someone pointed a gun at me, and I knew that ammo was &#8220;hard to get&#8221;, I wouldn&#8217;t s**t my pants. I would think &#8220;what a moron&#8221;.  </p>
<p>So private citizens owning/carrying firearms doesn&#8217;t deter invasions? What about Switzerland? They don&#8217;t even have a real standing army, yet it has been something like 800 years since they were last invaded. Every adult male and many females are issued military assault rifles and pistols by the government and are expected to use them. There is a story from they early 1900s (not sure if it really happened; however, it is still cool) that says, A German General was visiting Switzerland when he asked the Swiss Leader, &#8220;How many men to you command?&#8221; The Swiss replied, &#8220;I can have 1 million men ready in less then 24 hours.&#8221; The German the asked, &#8220;What would you and your men do if I marched 5 million troops in to your country tomorrow?&#8221; The Swiss smiled and said, &#8220;We would all take 5 shots, then we would go home!&#8221;   They have it right in Switzerland, they do shooting competitions that are sponsered by there Government. All of this to ensure they have the best collection of marksmen in the world so that they, not the &#8220;military&#8221; can defend the country. There are even jouurnalists that have noted 13 year old girls riding bikes from school to the gun range with fully automatic assault rifles strapped to thier backs. Oh, and I forgot to mention, they have very low violent and gun crime rates.</p>
<p>If our Government or military happen to try to take over the country, that is &#8220;suppress our rights as citizens&#8221;, whos responsibility is it defend those rights? The citizens of this great country!!! The militia was not designed to defend us from other countries but our own, if a &#8220;Hitler&#8221; came along. Tell me this, how exactly do you expect to defend yourself from the military without guns? Yes I know the military has the Navy and it&#8217;s many ASSets, the Air Force and it&#8217;s leathal arsenal, the Army and Marines as bullet catchers and slingers (just kidding guys), but we as citizens of a FREE country have the DUTY to defend ourselves and our rights. </p>
<p>Anybody who thinks that &#8220;Gun Control&#8221; will control anything, is simply ignorant. Many studies have been conducted using prison inmates as the subjects. They asked things like, &#8220;If you thought a person might be armed with a firearm, would you be likely to commit a crime against them?&#8221; The responses were so overwhelming that many Gun control advocates have had to rethink thier arguments. Almost all criminals interviewed said that they were less likely to commit ANY crime in an area that had little or no gun control; however, if gun control was intact, they wouldn&#8217;t hessitate. </p>
<p>The next time you decide to argue/debate a subject as heated as this one, PLEASE do some research and show up with a semi-intelligent opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Lady</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-29358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-29358</guid>
		<description>What I think is let people have all the guns they want.  BUT make it damn near impossible to get any ammunition.   Think about it if someone comes into your home and you point a gun at them (loaded or not) that person will probably s**t their pants and try to get away.  

Then you can just bash them on the head and wait for the police to arrive.  This in only effective if the gun is NOT loaded.  It defeats the purpose if you accidentally shoot yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is let people have all the guns they want.  BUT make it damn near impossible to get any ammunition.   Think about it if someone comes into your home and you point a gun at them (loaded or not) that person will probably s**t their pants and try to get away.  </p>
<p>Then you can just bash them on the head and wait for the police to arrive.  This in only effective if the gun is NOT loaded.  It defeats the purpose if you accidentally shoot yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-28267</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-28267</guid>
		<description>after you get shot dont shot the gun again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after you get shot dont shot the gun again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassie</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-27392</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-27392</guid>
		<description>Its a question of whether its worth punishing everybody in America for the idiots who aren&#039;t responsible enough to own a weapon. Its a item that has the potential to do tremendous harm, and while most people handle them responsibly, there are those who don&#039;t. 
I believe that the right to bear arms is a Constitutional right that should not be taken away. But as I live in the South( guns everywhere), I will say that it is far too easy to obtain a gun. Gunshows don&#039;t even look twice at who their buyer is. A kid can walk in a get one, no kidding. One of my teenage cousins did it. Its absurd. What is so wrong with checking for identification, age, criminal history, ect? Unless you have a record it won&#039;t affect you. People who are responsible enough to own a weapon will still be able to get their guns, while those who aren&#039;t mature enough or have used them unwisely in the past won&#039;t be able to get them. What is the harm in that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a question of whether its worth punishing everybody in America for the idiots who aren&#8217;t responsible enough to own a weapon. Its a item that has the potential to do tremendous harm, and while most people handle them responsibly, there are those who don&#8217;t.<br />
I believe that the right to bear arms is a Constitutional right that should not be taken away. But as I live in the South( guns everywhere), I will say that it is far too easy to obtain a gun. Gunshows don&#8217;t even look twice at who their buyer is. A kid can walk in a get one, no kidding. One of my teenage cousins did it. Its absurd. What is so wrong with checking for identification, age, criminal history, ect? Unless you have a record it won&#8217;t affect you. People who are responsible enough to own a weapon will still be able to get their guns, while those who aren&#8217;t mature enough or have used them unwisely in the past won&#8217;t be able to get them. What is the harm in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired Military Man</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-25688</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired Military Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-25688</guid>
		<description>&quot;Blayze Kohime Said,
November 4, 2007 @ 11:44 am 

If more guns mean less crime, why do countries with no guns have less crime? &gt;.&gt; Damn you statistics!&quot;


Blayze, 
Just out of curiosity, where do you aquire your statistics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blayze Kohime Said,<br />
November 4, 2007 @ 11:44 am </p>
<p>If more guns mean less crime, why do countries with no guns have less crime? &gt;.&gt; Damn you statistics!&#8221;</p>
<p>Blayze,<br />
Just out of curiosity, where do you aquire your statistics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIna</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-25687</link>
		<dc:creator>TIna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-25687</guid>
		<description>How many criminals actually care about gun control laws?   the only thing these laws  do is take away means of protection from the  law abiding citizens. you  outlaw guns , then only the criminals will  have guns. and  trust me... the criminals WILL GET GUNS NO MATTER WHAT LAWS THERE ARE  against them. 
 Hence the  term CRIMINALS.  criminals have no regard for the law PERIOD.  criminals  break laws... what makes you think they are going to  abide by  laws prohibiting  gun ownership.  most criminals  don&#039;t even OWN the gun they use in crimes.  The majority of the  time they obtain them  illegally anyway.
 
Ask yourself  this...(  hypothetical situation  where guns are illegal)  you are in your home with your family having a nice  dinner.. and  of course you  have no guns  in the house because  guns are illegal and you being a good law abiding   peace loving  citizen  you would NEVER  break the law by having a gun in   the house ( yes,,, redundant I know.. making a point here)  when  All of a sudden  a burglar breaks into your house and OMG... he has a gun!!!  What?  but. guns are ILLEGAL!!   do you think he cares?   hes going to  kill you and your family and  steal everything you own while you stand there helpless to defend  yourself  because you  donut own a gun. 
 you think a criminal who  commits  violent crimes  with a gun is gun is going to  be like  &quot; every on  the ground or I&#039;M  going to ask again really really loudly.. because  I don&#039;t have a gun  cus they&#039;re illegal!.&quot;  no...  a criminal  is going to FIND  guns.. even if it means .. OMG... committing a  CRIME.. to obtain one.... THINK PEOPLE.. what  is one  crime  of   possessing a gun  matter  to a criminal who intends to commit an even greater crime  of robbing a bank.. or killing you...  you really think hes gonna  worry about  braking the law by owning a gun?     COME ONE..  let  people have the means to defend themselves.  take the one  guy who open fired in a mall  killing 8 people then himself... all it would have taken  is ONE person there with a weapons permit  and the skill to use it to take  that dude out before  he killed ANYONE....  another story in the news recently...  a gunman open firing in  two different churches   until a former, or was it off duty I forget...  security guard  drew her weapon and  killed the  perpetrator, possibly saving  many more lives..  the more restrictions we  put on guns.. the  more criminals will have them and less law abiding people   can  defend themselves.. the  key is  PROPER EDUCATION ON SAFETY.. if you have  children  in the home TEACH THEM that it  is  not a toy.. take them to a safe  place and teach them the PROPER use of it. my brother  learned  how to  use a hunting riffle when he was 12 years old.. and  went hunting  frequently.  He knew  it was not a toy.. and knew how to use it safely  because  my parents  made him take lessons at the local  riffle range. WE have the  constitutional RIGHT to bear arms.   let us  USE that right and we can stop these violent criminals ourselves before they  hurt anyone. rather than wait and let the cops  investigate the murder afterwards. because tehre would BE No murder if the victim had a gun and knew how to use use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many criminals actually care about gun control laws?   the only thing these laws  do is take away means of protection from the  law abiding citizens. you  outlaw guns , then only the criminals will  have guns. and  trust me&#8230; the criminals WILL GET GUNS NO MATTER WHAT LAWS THERE ARE  against them.<br />
 Hence the  term CRIMINALS.  criminals have no regard for the law PERIOD.  criminals  break laws&#8230; what makes you think they are going to  abide by  laws prohibiting  gun ownership.  most criminals  don&#8217;t even OWN the gun they use in crimes.  The majority of the  time they obtain them  illegally anyway.</p>
<p>Ask yourself  this&#8230;(  hypothetical situation  where guns are illegal)  you are in your home with your family having a nice  dinner.. and  of course you  have no guns  in the house because  guns are illegal and you being a good law abiding   peace loving  citizen  you would NEVER  break the law by having a gun in   the house ( yes,,, redundant I know.. making a point here)  when  All of a sudden  a burglar breaks into your house and OMG&#8230; he has a gun!!!  What?  but. guns are ILLEGAL!!   do you think he cares?   hes going to  kill you and your family and  steal everything you own while you stand there helpless to defend  yourself  because you  donut own a gun.<br />
 you think a criminal who  commits  violent crimes  with a gun is gun is going to  be like  &#8221; every on  the ground or I&#8217;M  going to ask again really really loudly.. because  I don&#8217;t have a gun  cus they&#8217;re illegal!.&#8221;  no&#8230;  a criminal  is going to FIND  guns.. even if it means .. OMG&#8230; committing a  CRIME.. to obtain one&#8230;. THINK PEOPLE.. what  is one  crime  of   possessing a gun  matter  to a criminal who intends to commit an even greater crime  of robbing a bank.. or killing you&#8230;  you really think hes gonna  worry about  braking the law by owning a gun?     COME ONE..  let  people have the means to defend themselves.  take the one  guy who open fired in a mall  killing 8 people then himself&#8230; all it would have taken  is ONE person there with a weapons permit  and the skill to use it to take  that dude out before  he killed ANYONE&#8230;.  another story in the news recently&#8230;  a gunman open firing in  two different churches   until a former, or was it off duty I forget&#8230;  security guard  drew her weapon and  killed the  perpetrator, possibly saving  many more lives..  the more restrictions we  put on guns.. the  more criminals will have them and less law abiding people   can  defend themselves.. the  key is  PROPER EDUCATION ON SAFETY.. if you have  children  in the home TEACH THEM that it  is  not a toy.. take them to a safe  place and teach them the PROPER use of it. my brother  learned  how to  use a hunting riffle when he was 12 years old.. and  went hunting  frequently.  He knew  it was not a toy.. and knew how to use it safely  because  my parents  made him take lessons at the local  riffle range. WE have the  constitutional RIGHT to bear arms.   let us  USE that right and we can stop these violent criminals ourselves before they  hurt anyone. rather than wait and let the cops  investigate the murder afterwards. because tehre would BE No murder if the victim had a gun and knew how to use use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadyn the wise one</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23293</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadyn the wise one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-23293</guid>
		<description>I think that people who would do something dangerous with a gun are usually obviously noticed so anyone who would sell a gun to them are just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that people who would do something dangerous with a gun are usually obviously noticed so anyone who would sell a gun to them are just plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23076</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-23076</guid>
		<description>To the person who said that the gun owners are the reason we were not invaded. A History Major will call you WRONG. We were invaded in 1812 by the British during the war of 1812, guess you didn&#039;t pass US History. Also I think all the Planes, Ships, Tanks, and Artillery Peices of the US Armed Sevices are more threating then a bunch of civilians armed with pistols, rifles, and shotguns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the person who said that the gun owners are the reason we were not invaded. A History Major will call you WRONG. We were invaded in 1812 by the British during the war of 1812, guess you didn&#8217;t pass US History. Also I think all the Planes, Ships, Tanks, and Artillery Peices of the US Armed Sevices are more threating then a bunch of civilians armed with pistols, rifles, and shotguns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blayze Kohime</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-22734</link>
		<dc:creator>Blayze Kohime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-22734</guid>
		<description>If more guns mean less crime, why do countries with no guns have less crime? &gt;.&gt; Damn you statistics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If more guns mean less crime, why do countries with no guns have less crime? &gt;.&gt; Damn you statistics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thunderbird</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-22494</link>
		<dc:creator>thunderbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-22494</guid>
		<description>We dont need any more gun restrictions we need to go after the crinimals who misuse guns only a idiot would belive more gun control laws would stop crinimals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We dont need any more gun restrictions we need to go after the crinimals who misuse guns only a idiot would belive more gun control laws would stop crinimals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-21878</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-21878</guid>
		<description>“WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.”
Actually, if I seem to remember correctly, the US is technically a foreign power, it was invaded or &quot;claimed&quot; by England, the Americans fought back, I&#039;d call england&#039;s landing there in the first place invasion.
Also, since a loooong time ago, no foreign transport with the intent to invade has landed in Britain, no guns allowed over here, we&#039;re ok with that.
Funny story too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.”<br />
Actually, if I seem to remember correctly, the US is technically a foreign power, it was invaded or &#8220;claimed&#8221; by England, the Americans fought back, I&#8217;d call england&#8217;s landing there in the first place invasion.<br />
Also, since a loooong time ago, no foreign transport with the intent to invade has landed in Britain, no guns allowed over here, we&#8217;re ok with that.<br />
Funny story too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-21761</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-21761</guid>
		<description>Even if the person who owns the gun is a nice, law abiding, respectful person who simply wants to protect their family from potential dangers, I still think you should not give them guns.  I&#039;ve heard stories about how kids find guns of perfectly nice, law abiding, respectful parents who &quot;forget&quot; to lock up their gun in a cabinet, and save your kid the pain of accidently shooting himself, or others.  Just last year a kid in my school brought a knife to school and was threatning people with it.  I would have HATED to see what would happen if that was a gun that his parents had.  (And he was twelve at the time, smart enough to know what he was doing and how to operate them.)  If you must have guns, give them to actual police officers or other people like that who might actually need them in a crime, don&#039;t give them to everyone who asks for one.

Also, &quot;WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.&quot;  It&#039;s not because of guns, it&#039;s because of nuclear weapons.  I mean, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, we went and bombed them right back (maybe even realasing chemicals that might lead to lukemia).  That&#039;s why no other foreign power has invaded the U.S., not because some people have guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the person who owns the gun is a nice, law abiding, respectful person who simply wants to protect their family from potential dangers, I still think you should not give them guns.  I&#8217;ve heard stories about how kids find guns of perfectly nice, law abiding, respectful parents who &#8220;forget&#8221; to lock up their gun in a cabinet, and save your kid the pain of accidently shooting himself, or others.  Just last year a kid in my school brought a knife to school and was threatning people with it.  I would have HATED to see what would happen if that was a gun that his parents had.  (And he was twelve at the time, smart enough to know what he was doing and how to operate them.)  If you must have guns, give them to actual police officers or other people like that who might actually need them in a crime, don&#8217;t give them to everyone who asks for one.</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.&#8221;  It&#8217;s not because of guns, it&#8217;s because of nuclear weapons.  I mean, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, we went and bombed them right back (maybe even realasing chemicals that might lead to lukemia).  That&#8217;s why no other foreign power has invaded the U.S., not because some people have guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanna</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-21175</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-21175</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s *exceedingly* difficult to prove.&quot;

That&#039;s the _point_. Only give guns to those that _can_ prove this. Hence less guns, less gun violence, less idiots shooting others in front of a police... (Gotta say this story made my day: I&#039;m still laughing!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s *exceedingly* difficult to prove.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the _point_. Only give guns to those that _can_ prove this. Hence less guns, less gun violence, less idiots shooting others in front of a police&#8230; (Gotta say this story made my day: I&#8217;m still laughing!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-21027</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-21027</guid>
		<description>&quot;You should have to show that you’re not a danger to society or would do anything that would constitute harm against another person. You should have to prove your brain is still connected to the rest of your body.&quot;  I kind of resent this statement.  It seems to imply that most of us are &quot;...a danger...&quot;  and should prove otherwise and that&#039;s simply not true!  I daresay 99.999% of all legitimate gun owners are upright, law abiding citizens who are the backbone of our society.  Yes, accidents happen, and when something negative happens concerning a legal gun owner the press goes crazy.  You usually don&#039;t hear about crimes thwarted by gun-owners.  There&#039;s nothing to report!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You should have to show that you’re not a danger to society or would do anything that would constitute harm against another person. You should have to prove your brain is still connected to the rest of your body.&#8221;  I kind of resent this statement.  It seems to imply that most of us are &#8220;&#8230;a danger&#8230;&#8221;  and should prove otherwise and that&#8217;s simply not true!  I daresay 99.999% of all legitimate gun owners are upright, law abiding citizens who are the backbone of our society.  Yes, accidents happen, and when something negative happens concerning a legal gun owner the press goes crazy.  You usually don&#8217;t hear about crimes thwarted by gun-owners.  There&#8217;s nothing to report!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bones</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-20931</link>
		<dc:creator>bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-20931</guid>
		<description>There are over 3,000 gun control laws on the books now, maybe there ought to be some laws about being a politician, or maybe being able to sue a LAWYER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are over 3,000 gun control laws on the books now, maybe there ought to be some laws about being a politician, or maybe being able to sue a LAWYER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RONALD</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-20759</link>
		<dc:creator>RONALD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-20759</guid>
		<description>IF SOMEONE IS IN MY HOME (AT NIGHT) OR TRYING TO GET IN MY CAR ( VIOLENTLY) I AM GOING TO SHOOT FIRST  AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER. HE / SHE MAY HAVE A GUN , KNIFE, OR OTHER OBJECT TO HURT ME OR MY FAMILY... WHEN YOU TAKE THE GUNS FROM LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS... WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.
        ALL OF YOU BLEEDING HEARTS GO AHEAD AND ASK ALL YOUR QUESTIONS AND TRY TO FIGHT A CRIMINAL WITH A KNIFE, AND HE CUTS YOUR BLEEDING HEART OUT, THEN TELL ME TO BE CAREFULL AND NOT USE YO MUCH FORCE...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF SOMEONE IS IN MY HOME (AT NIGHT) OR TRYING TO GET IN MY CAR ( VIOLENTLY) I AM GOING TO SHOOT FIRST  AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER. HE / SHE MAY HAVE A GUN , KNIFE, OR OTHER OBJECT TO HURT ME OR MY FAMILY&#8230; WHEN YOU TAKE THE GUNS FROM LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, ONLY THE CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS&#8230; WHY DO YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES HAS NEVER BEEN INVADED BY A FOREIGN POWER, THERE IS 300 MILLION PEOPLE WITH GUNS.<br />
        ALL OF YOU BLEEDING HEARTS GO AHEAD AND ASK ALL YOUR QUESTIONS AND TRY TO FIGHT A CRIMINAL WITH A KNIFE, AND HE CUTS YOUR BLEEDING HEART OUT, THEN TELL ME TO BE CAREFULL AND NOT USE YO MUCH FORCE&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dumbcriminals.com/cars/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/comment-page-1/#comment-20746</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumbcriminals.com/guns/shoot-first-look-for-cops-later/#comment-20746</guid>
		<description>More guns means less crime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More guns means less crime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
